All systematic reviews share the following characteristics:
The term 'Systematic Review' refers to a specific entity. It is a specific type of 'literature review' though the term 'literature review' is often used interchangeably with 'systematic review'. All literature reviews should take a systematic approach, but that does not make them a 'Systematic Review'.
90% of the time this is what people undertaking a 'Systematic Review' are actually doing. "A research team might conduct a scoping review to help develop, prioritize, and refine research priorities and inform future reviews or primary research. Scoping reviews are also often used to predict resource requirements (time and budget) to help define review protocols. Since scoping reviews are designed to determine the size and scope of literature available, quality assessment is not needed" (from 8 types of systematic reviews you should know, by Jennifer Baguss).
(aka Rapid Evidence Assessment or Realist Review). "The rapid review is essentially a fast-tracked version of the systematic review. Rapid reviews are typically done when policymakers are working within a specific, tight timeframe and need quick turnaround. As a result, some critical systematic review steps are either modified or skipped entirely in a rapid review. For example, we might see less comprehensive search strategies, reduced use of grey literature (which can be challenging to find and process), more basic data extraction, and only simple quality appraisal" (from 8 types of systematic reviews you should know, by Jennifer Baguss).
(aka Meta-Review or Review of Reviews). "Umbrella reviews summarize data from multiple systematic reviews, rather than looking at primary studies. You can consider them to be a “review of reviews” or “overview of reviews.” Umbrella reviews are typically used when the researcher needs to address competing interventions in different reviews to report and highlight results. They typically include quality assessment of the studies within the reviews or of the reviews themselves and are often presented graphically or tabularly with some narrative aspects" (from 8 types of systematic reviews you should know, by Jennifer Baguss)..
(aka Qualitative Evidence Synthesis, Systematic Thematic Synthesis). "A qualitative review looks at themes and concepts across individual qualitative studies. Qualitative reviews may also be known as “meta synthesis” or “qualitative evidence synthesis.” Qualitative reviews employ quality assessment, but unlike systematic reviews, where the assessment is done to determine inclusion or exclusion, quality assessment in a qualitative review is used to mediate messages. Naturally, this type of review uses a narrative approach to presenting results, but tables and diagrams are also often used" (from 8 types of systematic reviews you should know, by Jennifer Baguss).
Studies must be appraised for quality, but this is currently under debate
Dual review
(aka Integrative Literature Review)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.